HoangNhatAnh said:
Nope, your posts: "many of us expect 3 parts so I have no idea of it would be a lie" and "You said "so what you told me originally are not true" means I was lying, and know you changed to I was told a lie by SE. They are totally different stuff" You are the one who mentioned it first, not me. I said: ''what you told me originally are not true'', not "you told me a lie" since you don't really understand Square's track record. And if i was them, i would have made FFVIIR into 20 parts for maximum money. Remake/Reboot/Sequel or whatever, as long as it's name is Final Fantasy VII, their fans will still come and buy it anyway. |
My first post on the thread: It would make it harder to make each part self-contained and feeling like a full game.
Your post that started the lying trend:
So what you told me originally are not true? At first, people think FFVIIR will be 3 parts, but now, it will be 6 parts or more?
Even then, you claimed each part is a $60 game will a lot contents, now they expand it into even more parts = more full $60 games, so why worry? A lot more full contents $60 games to play (6,7,8, or even 10 games), you should be happy about this, right?
So don`t try to put yourself out of it. Read what you wrote and say there is no implication of lying when not telling the truth while not spinning with semantic. No post of mine prior to yours said anything in this regard. They were all on saying IF they cut the game smaller it would be hard to make a full game and would likely tend to have more than the 3 parts we were expecting.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







