By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bofferbrauer2 said:

Anybody seen the first tests of AMD's U series of chips? Looks like Intel is in even more dire straits here

https://www.pcworld.com/article/3541009/ryzen-7-4700u-review-amds-budget-8-core-crushes-intels-10th-gen-chips-again.html

And probably the most damning slide out of the test was the handbrake test:

AMD's 8c/8t really crushing the 6c/12t of Intel under it's might.

Did I mention that the AMD system only costs a fraction of the Intel systems here?

JEMC said:

On another note, Intel has showed the first pic of its "Father of All" Xe-HP GPU:

https://www.techpowerup.com/266513/intel-teases-father-of-all-xe-hp-gpu

I know it's for the enterprise and HPC market, but that thing us massive, around 3700 mm².

Will it need a direct plug to the closest nuclear power plant to run?

The AMD processor wins because it uses a lot less power and can run at higher freq for longer than the Intel ones, that cna barely run at their advertised clocks. That gives AMD a processor that performs better, runs cooler and has longer battery life. What else can you ask for?

And that battery in the picture isn't there only for slace, it's also a disguised nuclear reactor similar to the one thoe Ghostbusters used, only more advanced and miniaturized.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.