Persona 5 Royal Review Thread - Current 95 Metacritic / 95 Opencritic

[DonFerrari]

Bandorr said:

DonFerrari said:

No need for the attacks. And sorry to point it out, but several games have similar amount of additional content as DLC costing 20. The only difference is that Atlus do more of a merger of the content really "recreating" the game.

Still that doesn't make it impossible to make it as DLC. It is just pure gready and we know it, and most companies would be called that when doing similar stuff.

What is it that Pemalite says? "Citation required".

I look forward to a list that will have 3+ games that had $20 DLC that had similar content to http://www.pushsquare.com/guides/persona-5-royal-changes-all-differences-compared-to-persona-5

And that list doesn't even have stuff like @Hiku pointed out with the changes in texture and colors of the picture. edit: oh it does it just isn't very clear with "

• Graphical enhancements on PS4 Pro"

and.. GO!

Haven't heard of a single game that charged extra for PS4Pro enhancement. Many including got patches (like Witcher 3) and were several years old when PS4Pro launched, Atlus didn't put a patch because they were either lazy/greed or waiting for their relaunch (and let's be real the graphic of the original P5 is a joke, even the royal is very low level compared to most AAA games).

On the games that have a lot of additional content but you aren't demanded to purchase again let's see Destiny, Witcher 3, SF5, Tomb Raider, Assassins Creed. Hey I done more than 3.

And having said that, when even full remaster of previous gen with all DLC got released for 40 bucks there really isn't any excuse for full charge of what in essence is a improve GOTY edition. No matter how much you want to defend the game or the dev (not sure why you defend paying more, but ok) it could have been done as a 20 bucks DLC.