Chazore said:
The dev literally states one issue being the "console memory budget". I don't know how far he needs to go to tell you the issues he's had with making the game work on current gen. I think it's a tad delusional, that anyone here, stating that "Witcher 3 Switch", doesn't mean everything is extremely polished, extremely sublime and honky dory. I've seen plenty of games with plenty of object pop in, texture pop in, NPC's bugging out, short shadow LoD's, short object rendering distances etc, and a lot of those issues aren't "devs are crap", it's mostly down to console constraints and what they can handle, and that's what we get as a n end result, that's why Witcher 3 got it's downgrade, and how the devs tried to hide that a lot of the time (because let's be real, who sees any dev going out there, who works with console publishers, and openly claims "yo consoles are weak sauce", and still expect to have console porting contracts handed to them?, be honestly real with me, who would do that and why would they?).
|
...It was just a pun on console memory budget = monetary budget. If I wanted to make the joke more obvious, should I have gone with the Obsidian = errors = bad programmers joke instead? Sorry, I didn't mean to offend anyone. I'm not at all denying the devs claims.
