By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bandorr said:
BraLoD said:

Again, where did I ever say it would be free? The bolded definitely doesn't show it.

Why is rebuying an issue? That I have already said. Because why should I pay another full price release for a game I already did, to get some extra stuff?

Persona 5 Royal is $60, that's the difference from a $20 DLC: $40.

Because I already own Persona 5 and won't pay $60 for it again to get the same game with some changes, as someone who supported their game I should have the option to just buy the extra stuff on a patch (with the new textures and changes). I have the whole game already.

I fail to see how you are missing the point so much, unless its impossible for them to do it (which is what I came to ask in this thread and have yet to see something pointing to it) making me rebuy the whole game as the only option is definitely a scumbag move.

This is not PS2 days anymore.

Persona 5 Royal is $60 right now. It won't always be that price. It will discount. Let me quote you - to you.

"Will we get Royal as a new game+ DLC for Persona 5 owners someday?"

Some day. Persona 5 Royal will be discounted some day. Persona 5 royal will probably be $20 some day.

So how is Persona 5 Royal being discounted "some day" any different than Atlus releasing Persona 5 Royal as dlc "some day".

But I'm starting to see this as a waste of time. You are lacking logic, reason, common sense, and the ability to communicate well. Plus you are ignoring everyone that is telling you this isn't just "some content".

No need for the attacks. And sorry to point it out, but several games have similar amount of additional content as DLC costing 20. The only difference is that Atlus do more of a merger of the content really "recreating" the game.

Still that doesn't make it impossible to make it as DLC. It is just pure gready and we know it, and most companies would be called that when doing similar stuff.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."