Xxain said:
It wasnt suppose to be a good comparison but on the same quality as those that believe that CV should of been chosen because it was RE3 in early development. Ok. So? My argument was never a battle between between RE3 and CV in regards to what is more significant, but that CV is ultimate NOT important if someone wanted to catch on the series before RE8 and that is dead true; many started with RE4 as their first game and had no issues with understand plot. I don't know why you're lecturering me about sales when I flat out said CAPCOM could shit in a bag and call it RE are it would be a multi million selling regardless of original sales in a earlier post. |
Well... Only RE fans care about the silly story of these games. Nobody needs to play Re2 remake 3 remake to get into the series, Re4 already was the most popular game of the series and Revelations 1 and 2 were pretty mainstream as well and nobody cared about the story in these games not even in RE7.
These "remakes" are just nostalgia cash grabs that fans are eager enough to throw their money at and love to get dissapointed by meanwhile the casual audience just buys whatever is trending at the moment and are okay with it as long as its fun. My point is Remake and Zero sold terribly when they first launched and were mostly ignored by Capcom until they had no more ideas where to go further with the game then decided to remaster both these games because they make a quick buck because of their nostalgia value, that's all. So the same could work for CV because the fans are definitely there.
You said CV doesn't bring anything new or important to the series and that is false because, for those that care, it continues the story of RE2 and Wesker which is back in RE5. And yeah Capcom could sell us a bag of shit and sell millions but that would only work once. Fandoms are indeed blinded by nostalgia but they eventually take off their nostalgia glasses and move on.








