By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Snoorlax on 13 April 2020
Edit Thread
Xxain said:
Snoorlax said:

Actually Cove Veronica is much more important that RE3 which is why RE3 was originally meant to be a spin-off to RE 2 and Code V was meant to be the official sequel but Capcom had a partnership deal with Sony they could only release a numbered RE game on PS1 so they made the spin-off RE3 which really didn't bring anything new other than Nemesis.

Code V explores the origin of the family behind the mansion, Umbrella corp if i'm not mistaken, the origin of the virus, Chris and Claire reuniting and up against Wesker who turned out to be alive after RE1 and is the true villain of the series. Everything about Code V screams a true sequel, only Steve was kind of stupid and annoying to have around, but other than that it's a great game that unfortenately failed because it launched on the wrong console at the wrong time.

You guys sound like a broken record; A large amount of post are saying the same...damn...thing. CAPCOM does not care that CV was suppose to be RE3, because that issue was solved 20 years. Its a really stupid jutisication considering how development of games rapidly. Devil May Cry was a RE4 at first, so are going to whine about DMC not getting a remake too? The business sense is having the mainline series easily available for those needing to catch up. M-two is composed of Platinum and CAPCOM employees that worked on RE4; has anybody considered that RE4 was chosen because because of the developers knowledge of said game? 

We are saying the same thing because it's facts. What you don't like facts now? To say that RE3 is more significant than CV story and gameplay wise is not only stupid but also dead wrong.

We know Capcom doesn't care but they also didn't care for RE Remake, Zero and 3 for a long time until they gave them a remake because they had no idea where to go further after RE6 bombed critically. They knew these games have huge nostalgia behind them despite low sales originally yet Capcom capatilised on it. So it's not always about how games performed 20 years ago but about if actual demand for a remake is there then they'll give us that remake no problem cause they sure made a quick buck on that half assed RE3 remake. I'm actually against all this remake BS but I'd gladly take a CV remake over RE4 that doesn't need it at all. 

Sorry but that DMC-RE4 example is a terrible comparison.