By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nautilus said:
DonFerrari said:

Some replies on it say that it was more of a Enix thing than Squaresoft. So perhaps after the merger there was still bad blood with half the company not being well received over there.

Oh ok, thanks!

Doesn't know if it is true, but it makes sense with very large companies that some division would have better relationship than another when a merger occur.

Like with the company I work for, one of the main reasons it was acquired was due to it having superb customer relationship while the company that purchased us had burned a lot of bridges and had bad relationship overall.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."