mjk45 said:
Thanks for the clarity, sometimes it hard to ascertain the context of a post especially when the first reference is a fare way back and there are lots of text heavy posts, that why I said the context might be wrong, i based the critique on your post stating 50% of the site being Nintendo fans and misinterpreted curl-6's reply thinking it was saying the reason for such healthy numbers was the mod teams cracking down on nintendo trolling rather than all trolls regardless, so Curl I apologise. and have edited out that line. |
I was mocking him. When your userbase is the most proeminent on the forum then you are more likely to feel at home =] but yes the mods removing the weeds is much more important. As I said in a previous post every fanbase can have a good time here, first because the mods mostly do a fine work and as humans they will fail from time to time, and there are themed discussions and the nations threads (where if I'm not wrong moderation is even harsher for anyone being negative against that company).
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."