By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 09 April 2020
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
0D0 said:
Off topic: I'm not using PS Now for blockbusters. I've been using it for those less attractive games that I wouldn't buy for $1. So far, I've played a good bunch of nice games a year on PS Now so it's been worth paying the subscription.

Not really off topic actually.

If you're an avid core gamer, there is a ton of stuff you may want to dabble in. Its a service that certainly has value for that kind of user. I also think this is why the service is often ignored, there is no real expectation of what the service is getting or will offer down the road. At best this is a well curated service for what it is, but only worth $60 a year going this direction. It took too long to hit this current price.

I'm not sure why you would gladly play games on this service but ignore them for $1. Anything I am remotely interested in is worth $1.

Perhaps he means like he test the games he wouldn't pay 1 otherwise.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."