By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vivster said:
JEMC said:
^Yeah, saw and while at first I fell for it, the PCIe 5.0 and GDDR7 parts made it obvious that it was fake.

Now we can go back to doubting AMD that Big Navi will come anywhere near Ampere.

Let's hope that it does, and that it brings back some common sense to the pricing of both companies.

Bofferbrauer2 said:
JEMC said:
Take it with a punch of salt, but we've got some benchmarks from China about some of the upcoming Intel processors:

Intel Comet Lake-S (Core i7-10700, i5-10600K, i5-10500 and i5-10400) tested
https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-comet-lake-s-core-i7-10700-i5-10600k-i5-10500-and-i5-10400-tested

The i7 10700 seems to be on par with the R7 3700X and the same goes for the i5 10600 and the R5 3600X.

Was to be expected that they reach similar performance. The question is more at which power draw do they achieve that.

This is supposedly the power consumption chart, but it's worth keeping in mind that the Intel parts are still engineering samples:



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.