By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Runa216 said:
o_O.Q said:

" All this newfangled evidence and experience and updated science is not actual science"

so you agree then with this:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07238-8

"A move to classify people on the basis of anatomy or genetics should be abandoned."

can you explain why?

what do you think I'm arguing against exactly?

You do realize that there's a huge difference between the nearly binary differentiation of biological sex and the spectrum that is gender, right? Is that too complicated and nuanced for your narrative?

"You do realize that there's a huge difference between the nearly binary differentiation of biological sex and the spectrum that is gender, right?"

how have I indicated otherwise?

can you post for me anything in my posts that substantiates this assertion?

Gender is mentioned nowhere in this proposition so why do you and the other guy keep trying to strawman away from addressing what is right in front of you?

"A move to classify people on the basis of anatomy or genetics should be abandoned."