By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mZuzek said:
DonFerrari said:

If he hit the nail on the head explain and give evidence that they misunderstood the core of their own character but you understood better then all of them.

"Giving evidence" is not how opinions work, dude.

But it when you say the dev didn't understood the core of their own character you need to show evidence of that. Present what the char done or how do you have a better understanding of the char. Otherwise someone would be trying to push their opinion over the reality.

Saying they didn't like what a char done or what the char was is ok as opinion, to say for him a specific action of a char didn't match what he was doing or show would also be ok. But a cover all "misunderstood the core of the char" needs proof.

How would a conversation be generated from let's say something like this?

"Akira Toriyama doesn't understand the core of hi characters because that is my opinion".



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."