By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
drkohler said:
DraconianAC said:

I've been subscribed to Coreteks for a while now; he makes a compelling argument here which is basically AMD's solution inspired by Nvidia's solution,

This is just one reson why you should NOT reference people like this guy who does not know what he is talking about. You should listen to people who are a) hardware knowledgeable b) programmers that actually know how to handle gpus

This guy is c) : Clickbaiter disguising as technobabbler.

(Not my assessment, but several devolpers' opinions).

Which developer opinions? Would you be kind enough to share your source(s)?

About click bait: I've not seen anything from Coreteks that ever felt like click bate. Sure he talks about potential avenues that may occur, but he is clear in describing them as such. In fact, the guy has over 100k subscribers and most of his videos are highly liked, and I can tell what a click bate is; here is an example: CrapgamerReviews on Youtube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFhc9fgFQBvZ9iH3BfLK9Ow). Coreteks has educated me about RISC-V ISA, x86-64 processors, GPU/CPU company technologies, ARM processors, etc. and the topics he dwells on are not click bate, so I respectfully disagree with your assessment.

About tecnobabble: I don't think having a civilized discourse on potential bottlenecks in X86-64 technology is technobabble. If you don't understand the content, then why would you bash it as technobabble? I would think most of us here are curious and want to learn more about the PS5 tech. I'm willing to entertain what Mark Cerny, Digital Foundry, Moore's law is dead, Coreteks, NX Gamer, etc are saying about the PS5 because I'm curious, and bored. (Covid 19)