HoangNhatAnh said:

DonFerrari said:

And I haven't said Nintendo shouldn't do it. But you compared fan making a level using Nintendo IP to Nintendo making a game out of Sony IP. Those aren't nearly similar situations.

Why would Sony expend money on litigation to avoid removing the content Nintendo requested?

No other IP owner was requesting removal of let`s play, and Youtube kept them all fine, when Nintendo took issue with it they removed only for Nintendo because they have no interest in losing money on it.

So Nintendo is right when they do it.

"Why would Sony expend money on litigation to avoid removing the content Nintendo requested" Even Sony know this fan game is illegal, so they have to remove it, thank you for agreeing with me.

They are in their right to take measures, in this case I do agree they have ground, but several others they don't.

And no, it doesn't need to be illegal for sony to agree to take it out. Litigation cost is still very high even if you are right or there isn't anything illegal occuring.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994