By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HollyGamer said:
Azzanation said:

Holly, the point isn't hard to grasp. Fan made or not, the fact its Mario not on a Nintendo device or without Nintendo's consent affects the IPs quality in itself and profits Sony and not Nintendo since Dreams is only on PS4. If Sony want content like that to be there without any issues than maybe Sony should release Dreams on the Switch, than Nintendo might let it go. Fan made content will help sell Dreams and PS4s not Nintendo Switches, that's the bottom line and that's why Nintendo want to take this stuff down. Want Mario? buy a Switch, there is a perfectly good Mario game out there in Mario Odyssey.

I agree on Nintendo taking full control on there IP's reputations and id expect Sony to do the exact same if Nintendo had a content creating tool using IPs from Sony. This is why Nintendo have the most valuable IPs in the entire industry, Nintendo don't let them get washed out by others.

So if someone have Lego toys and build Mario world inside Lego and let children  play their Lego by free,  does that also allow Nintendo to send cease and decease?  

For him it wouldn't because it is also on Switch, you tell or I tell?

Hint, people could watch youtube on Nintendo devices, didn`t stop them to ordering take down of all non-sanctioned let`s play content.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."