By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 25 March 2020
Edit Thread
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

Who said it would be fair to make false parallelism against Nintendo? But then you agree what you were doing was false?

What's false? Explain it.

HollyGamer said:

Why are you changing the subject LOL . No one talk about them or even defend those fan boy. Don't generalize all fans. 

So you said i defended Nin without attacking Sony was wrong, but you attacked someone to defend another is fine? A fan made game about Nintendo character on ps4? No different than Metroid AM2R on pc which got taken down by Nin. If it is on Nin system only, it may work, but not this.

So you are taking back that you done false paralelism or will you keep it to say it isn't ok if it's made to defend Nintendo but ok to defend Sony? Which do you want? Can't have both.

We are discussing Nintendo demanding take down from a fan made content inside a Sony game and you gone for Nintendo making a Sony IP by itself. That is false paralelism.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."