By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
goopy20 said:
Conina said:

Probably 720p/30 fps if they are lazy or 800p to 900p with additional tweaks.

It also depends how much headroom the 1440p/30fps has. If 35 - 40 fps are possible for the Series X unlocked and they lock it down to 30 fps for consistency, 800p/30 fps with the same settings or 900p - 1080p with additional tweaks could be possible.

But don't you need roughly twice the processing power to go from 720p to 1440p and hit the same 30fps? Also, for argument sake, lets say that game is 100% optimized on Series X and there's no head room to play with. It's a visual spectacle that pushes Series X to its limits and even has some drops here and there below 30fps, just like we're seeing with most console games today.

You need 4x as much power, you were already explained that. So since XSX would be 3x over XSS then between 800 and 900p would be the area for the 3x difference.

More likely would be 1080p on Series S versus 4k on Series X. Plus there would be other assets differences like texture because it would be pointless to keep evertyhing else equal except it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."