By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Conina said:
goopy20 said:

Okay maybe you can help me out here. If a game is pushing Series X to its limits at 1440p/30fps, what resolution would they need to scale down to on Series S (with the same graphics settings) to hit the same framerate? 

Probably 720p/30 fps if they are lazy or 800p to 900p with additional tweaks.

It also depends how much headroom the 1440p/30fps has. If 35 - 40 fps are possible for the Series X unlocked and they lock it down to 30 fps for consistency, 800p/30 fps with the same settings or 900p - 1080p with additional tweaks could be possible.

And variable res (because we could consider the game could be above 1440 but choose it for standard) it could even be 900-1080 as you said. Also no idea why they would use the same for everything else since you won't need same res for textures and some other aspects.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."