By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Conina said:
goopy20 said:

I know how graphics settings work on pc. My point is that if developers have a game that's completely optimized to run at 30fps/1440p on Series X, it's not going to be using overly expensive graphics settings that can be scaled down that much on Series S. Not using them is the whole point of console optimization. The only thing they could do is lower the resolution and we would be looking at sub 720p on Series S compared to 1440p on Series X. 

That's wrong, no matter how often you repeat your false narrative.

Lowering the resolution ain't their only option. There are a lot of other options to tweak the performance for the devs.

And even if they took the lazy way by just reducing the resolution... how the heck do you come from 30fps/1440p to sub 720p? 900p or dynamic 720p - 900p would be much more probable, if the Lockhart has at least one third the GPU performance and almost the CPU performance of the Series X. 

Actually since CPU would be the same we could even see something strange like 720p60fps on Series S for a 1440p30fps Series X title right?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."