By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
trunkswd said:

Powerwise, starting with the Wii, Nintendo has been a generation behind Microsoft and Sony. But power isn't everything. Look at the Switch. Having a hybrid console was a smart move. 

This is a whole 'nother kettle of fish that's a bit off topic, but I wouldn't call the Switch a full generation behind PS4/Xbone, as it outperfoms last gen by quite a bit and its actually more modern hardware than PS4/Xbone. Probably a conversation for another thread though haha.

Switch isn't a gen behind (it is quite weaker but that is a different thing), but people calling it 9th gen are even more wrong. Also I don't remember features or capabilities (besides portability) on Switch that can't be one on the PS4 and X1.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."