thismeintiel said:
How about we try not to be dickish? No one said anything about them breaking even at $399. Of course they would be taking a $50+ loss, but that is still something Sony would be fine with doing.
Well, we already know Japan gives them a 8M-9M advantage. EU should go big in Sony's favor, as usual. NA and the UK, I can see it being pretty damn close. Unless the launch prices are something like $399 vs $599. In that case, MS can brag about power all they want, it won't help them. Of course, you also have the fact that Sony will still have games that you can't get anywhere else. As for realistic prices, I could definitely see Sony taking a $50-$100 hit to land at a $399 price point. This will be a very important gen for them, and PS is one of the largest pillars for the company. They need it to succeed. Definitely can't see them going above $449. MS, on the other hand, are going to sell this thing as close to cost as possible. That's why I can see it going for anywhere from $499-$599, depending on how much it sctually costs to make. |
Sony certainly plan on undercut MS on the higher spec consoles, that is the reason they didn't set the price. The cost is on refining calculation, the retail price already have the range they can tolerate, now they just want to be more certain of how much cheaper they can and will sell.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."