By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 18 March 2020
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
Nu-13 said:

Your "consideration" doesnt change the fact swith is both porta le and home console.

Not only is that false, its also irrelevant. The ps4 and x1 didnt start the 8th gen, so the time between those and switch doesnt matter. First system.to come out a significant amount of time after the previous gen started will begin a new gen.

Switch came 4 years after wii u and ps5/xsx are coming 4 years after switch. So gen 9 for switch and 10 for the next consoles. This is just how it is and has no bearing in what system or games are better.

Switch was not designed as a home console. It's portable that also works like a home console. The specs reflect that.

It seems you feel Nintendo determines gens. Sony and MS missed a whole gen because Nintendo evidently begins and ends them by your logic.

It was Zero alt and got banned, don't bother.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."