By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
src said:

Obviously they aren't going to forward project 100 million. However what they will project is higher yearly console sales, which again goes to the general rule of larger volumes reducing average price. 

That is what you are claiming though... That because YOU believe that Sony is going to sell 100~ million consoles they will get a cheaper price.

Don't back track now.

Well yes that point was wrong. But at this moment of negotiation all parts of PS5 would probably be bought for a little less than Xbox Series X because by their historic Sony will have higher purchase orders than MS (even more if Lockhart is a thing and MS wants Series X to be like X1X). That is a reason why I expect PS5 to undercut XSX by 50-100. Now the question is can they get under 450 or to 400 or if Lockhart at under 300 will have a lot of leeway and then be a big seller for most people that don't really care about having most performance and like the best bang for your buck.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."