By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
src said:
Ljink96 said:

Bruh...just stop. You're missing the plot entirely. 

You not being able to understand basic manufacturing and business is not my problem. 

1) MS and other big companies have been beaten by companies with far smaller cash reserves, AKA you're whole burn cash point is incorrect. 

2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economies_of_scale Average cost decreases as output increases. 100 million > 50 million

HoangNhatAnh said:

Declining? Like PS2 (155 mil) to PS3 (90 mil), right?

Yes. Xbox went from 90 million -> <50 million 

Again, stop. This new manufactured hardware starts from zero. This is not about anecdotes you have about beating a company, it's about cold hard facts. Microsoft can factually take more of a beating than Sony ever could solely because of their wealth they've acquired since their inception. 

This is about being logical, not about burning cash. Use common sense and connect the dots. Of course no company wants to burn cash, but it'd be an easier decision for Microsoft to make than Sony for numerous reasons you didn't care to absorb. Link me Wikipedia articles all day, it changes nothing. Sony and Microsoft will be starting from 0 consoles sold starting holiday 2020. We don't even know how many consoles will be shipped from either this holiday. Quit the nonsense man.