| Azzanation said: Its the quality of the awards that means most, not the quantity of the awards. That's my opinion and you both can disagree all you want. The gaming industry is a bias place and MS, Sony and Nintendo can easily pay tribute to publishers for a helping hand in giving these awards out, its why I clearly stay away from unknown and random or simple unrecognisable awards and reviews. |
Désolé Fred/TruckOSaurus... Mais ça doit être dit d’une façon où d’une autre.
Calice que t’es un tabarnak de cave! What makes a random group of people voting for one given game of the year above another random group of people voting for whatever else game of the year? Their budget? Credential? What credential? Have you ever read anything other than what’s mainstream in the US? Have you ever used your brain to think for yourself or are you fine regurgitating what the mass media tells you, without ever trying to dig deeper into what goes on behind the decisions to choose a game of the year over all other choices available. You discount everything that isn’t written by the English gaming press as if anyone from a different background holds no credibility. Because, hey, they don’t have an award show?
Most game of the year awards for most if not all publications are chosen by a panel no more or no less credible or knowledgeable than the TGA show.
But because the TGA is a popular show, you dismiss everything else and choose it as gospel? You are basically admitting to being nothing more than a brainless automate by regurgitating this kind of argument. Shallow, petty, biased, and an automate? *Slow claps*
Good job, you’ve evolved heaps since the day you signed on here.
