Metallox said:
This is pure nonsense, and I think you're aware why. In part because the people you know don't represent the majority, in part because Witcher 3 is the standout of the series, and, most importantly, the quality of a game simply can't be defined by the traction it generates on people to play other entries of their respective franchise. You're here to judge the individual strenghts of the game, whatever it does for CDPR and their adaptation of The Witcher is another story. |
Standout yes, but everyone seems to say its great because of the story, which started on the first one. So if people really love the story, why not go back and start from the beginning?
Graphics of Witcher 2 are amazing on the X, I play it, it looks incredible in 4K.
People keep talking about strengths of the game, and this and that, but they never seem to be specific, was it graphics? Graphics of Skyrim are very impressive in 4K on ps4 pro and xbox X, and in my opinion has a better atmosphere, Witcher looks too clean and pretty for such a violent world.
Witcher has some good music, but it starts to get tiring after you heard it 1000 times.
I get the feeling most people praising Witcher they just do so because that's the accepted thing to do, everyone seems to want to fit in society, no one seems able to have their own opinions.
I ask these people, write it here all the things Witcher does better, if it is the story then say what part of the story, don't just keep saying its great because its amazing and fantastic. Specify everything.
If you like the story and cutscenes then admit you prefer to watch cutscenes than playing the games, and that's fine, that's why they come up with interactive movie games these days.
