Teraflops are NOT a Measurement of Gaming Performance

[DonFerrari]

Mr Puggsly said:

DonFerrari said:

Nope, you said "MS boasted power given that seemed important and it worked" ... if it didn't addressed the gap in sales how did it worked? I swear many people in VGC say MS doesn't do what it do for console warriors but to improve its bottom line, so if you don't have evidence of it improving sales how did it work?

You got me, this was clearly a sales debate. Clearly anything MS does that doesn't close the sales gap is ultimately pointless.

Remember guys, if MS does anything good like making a fantastic piece of hardware like X1X. All you have to do is say, "b... b... but did it close the sales gap!?!?" You'll always win a debate that way. Even when it's completely irrelevant to the discussion.

Don't make a strawman to cover yourself.

You were the one that said "MS boasted power given that seemed important and it worked".

I didn't say it was useless/pointless or that it isn't good to have a strong HW. But for a company the measure of something working is it bringing revenue, and that didn't happen so you can't claim it worked.

You just know you made a bad point and can't admit.