By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
shikamaru317 said:
DonFerrari said:
The strange thing on this rumor is that if Lockhart is about the same as Series X except a GPU that is 1/3 the power then the price difference can't be 200 or more, since even the whole GPU on Series X won't cost 200.

See my post above. There are likely a few other differences other than the GPU, but they will be minor differences, the GPU is the only significant downgrade.

And I don't really expect all the other savings to amount to 200 USD.

Even more if we compare to PS5 being 399-449 then it would be 100-150 difference.

For me that seems much more money saved than they would be able on the GPU (I would expect 50-100 saving on the GPU part of the APU). And for me that is a very poor saving, putting an immense bottleneck on the design for a small saving, having 1/3 performance for a small saving.

But sure we need to wait until things are final and running, with proper price and review before being sure how effective it really will be.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."