The_Liquid_Laser said:
fixed that for you
Sony is responsible for their console. When people complain about Wind Waker and Super Mario Sunshine not being as good as other entries, then that is Nintendo's fault. If Sony's first party games are as good on PS4 that is Sony's fault. I liked Sony's first party offerings more on previous consoles than on PS4. That is definitely their fault. On top of that Sony is responsible for their 3rd party library, as a whole, too. When Final Fantasy 7 went to Playstation instead of N64, was that Nintendo's fault? Yes! Every console maker has a strategy for attracting third party developers. This affects both how many third party games they get, but it also affects the type of third party games they get. So if PS4 doesn't have many games for either me or curl-6, then is that Sony's fault? Yes! How can it be anyone else's fault? Sony is responsible for their own console. |
Sure for the games curl wanted Sony is certainly at fault with him.
Sony didn't loose games to Xbox or Switch, they didn't became exclusives, they weren't made. Sony can't obligate devs to make specific games (sure they can entice), and also Sony have sponsored some games on third parties. But Sony can't hire devs to make IPs of other companies. So your complain was completely irrelevant. You may not like PS4 and that is perfectly fine, but that had nothing to do with any changes Sony made or should do for PS5.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."