By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:

You get crap like "Ain't nothin gonna beat X series X, there ain't no PC with enough flops to beat it!", and that's just one example of the crap some people spread over there. Colteastwood is doing a bang up job on spreading misinformation and making Tflops his main boasting point for Xbox, to a point where he's downplaying PS5's supposed specs, and then his fanboys downplaying PC at the same time.

I wish that Xbox's marketing team wasn't so high up on spreading bullshit information or trying to warp it to make it sound like it'd be something the casual or laymen folk would know about (but they don't, so now we're seeing this shit spread like wild-fire, just like "blast processing" from the old days). I honestly wish it'd stop, because it just makes some folk look really, really stupid.

There are groups on PC, Playstation, Switch and Xbox... All spread "FUD" and "Hyperbole". - What I try and do is remove the rubbish.

victor83fernandes said:

You're missing the point, Microsoft NEEDS to compete with playstation, they wouldn't launch a much weaker console, unless they want to come in 3rd place yet again for the 3rd time. In fact that would be free advertising for sony, it would be all over gaming news and word of mouth that ps5 is way more powerful, everyone would just pay a bit more and get the ps5.

Maybe thats what microsoft wants, I get a feeling they've been wanting to quit gaming consoles for a long time now, they aren't even trying anymore.

Great. Then let Microsoft advertise.
If they propagate bullshit, I will call them out on it... And if you know me on these forums... I will call Nintendo and Sony out on it as well.

victor83fernandes said:

If ps5 base console is 450dollars, it would be at least 9 teraflops, xbox would be a laughing joke if it is less than half the graphical power, people would just joke that it isn't even next gen while ps5 is the true next gen. Not to mention there wont even be exclusives on xbox for 2 years. No one would buy it. And a console without a disc drive? See how well the xbox one S all digital did? It didn't sell much at all. Most people would rather pay a bit more and get the option of disc drive.


Im not complaining about 4tf against the xbox X, Im looking how it compared to the competition next generation.

How does price have anything to do with flops? How would lockhart be less than half the graphical power?

The Xbox One SAD's failure might not be because people actually want a disc drive... It could also be partially be the fault of pricing, the regular Xbox One S isn't that much more expensive... And when discounted is often the same price or cheaper anyway.

victor83fernandes said:
shikamaru317 said:

Original rumors were that it would have the same 1 TB SSD as Series X. I doubt they'd go smaller, since it's digital only and even 1 TB will fill up fast with next gen file sizes, and I also doubt they'll go larger if they're aiming for $300. 

At 300dollars they would never in a million years put a 1terabyte ssd, that would cost half the price of the console parts (without the controller), unless they put HDD instead, the xbox X uses HDD not ssd.

Not all SSD's are the same price, performance or quality.
Wait until we get more information before jumping to conclusions, could be just a cache setup.

Conina said:
victor83fernandes said:

There is no way this is true, like at all

2 - 4 Teraflops Is way below the current generation xbox X, even below the ps4 pro, that wont happen

3 - Microsoft will not risk the bad marketing and the jokes again this generation, launching a new gen console weaker than the current gen

Both Geforce GTX 1650 Super (4.9 TFlops) and Radeon RX 5500 XT (5.2 TFlops) are on par with a Radeon RX 590 (7.1 TFlops).

The graphic performance of a 4 TFlops Lockhart would probably be on par with the 6.2 TFlops of the Xbox One X and wouldn't have the CPU-bottleneck.

So average performance of the Xbox One X with better frametimes / less slowdowns.
Similar performance in high resolutions, but better performance in FullHD.

Likely faster. We need to remember that Lockhart -is- using RDNA2 which is 50% more performant/efficient than RDNA 1 which in turn is 50% more performant/efficient than GCN.

Conina said:
DialgaMarine said:
Personally, I don’t see the point in having a lower end console like this if they already have the XB1X, and plan to keep putting games on last gen hardware for the next couple years anyways. Probably be smarter to just cut the price of X and develop on that as the lower end console, if they absolutely need a lower end.

The point is that a XSS (Xbox Series S) is probably cheaper to produce than a X1X (Xbox One X) while being at least as fast as the X1X and avoiding some bottlenecks (CPU, RAM, loading times).

Yeah it would be if they can reduce the complexity of the power delivery and cooling system.




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite