By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Trumpstyle said:

Guys this doesn't disprove github, there's nothing in there about the gpu being Navi 10, this is just a random assumption some people have. Same as either being rdna1 or rdna2.

Amd confirming PS5 is RDNA2 and that the architecture has clock improvements actually make github more possible as 2ghz looked hard even if they were using Tsmc 7nm EUV. They also comfirmed that RDNA2 has ipc gains (Perf/ghz).

As Github brought Oberon back from the dead another idea of mine is back from the dead. That it's possible that no insider actually knows the TF number for PS5, that they or their sources are guessing it based on game performance from the gpu inside the devkit. Based on my previous list, the insiders seems to believe ps5 is at ~11tf. An 9.2TF Rdna2 would only need 20% stronger TFs to be equal to 11TF Rdna1.

It's also possible that Oberon is just BC stuff and the 36CU/2ghz is just PS5 BC boost mode and nothing else or just outdated.

You won't forfeit. I respect that.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."