JWeinCom said:
But... if the fat is the last reserve to keep you alive, isn't that the time, when you're not eating food, that it's there for? It just doesn't make sense to me. Maybe I just need to study it a bit more. |
If we put fat as last reserve, then it means you have at least one before it, muscle. So on this drastic change you would probably burn more muscle than fat. You can look that several people that do drastic diet + cardio they look sick and with a lot of skin flabbiness. Because they lost a lot of muscle together.
Let's say the person had 200Lb and 6" with a BF of 30% (60lb of fat). He done a drastic diet and a lot of cardio and lost 50Lb, but his BF only dropped to 20% (30lb of fat). So that would mean from 50Lb lost he would have lost also 20lb of muscle. Instead if he have done it with more care or less extreme he would have lost let's say 35Lb (same 30Lb of fat but only 5lb of muscle) that would make his BF 18% so he would look skinner, healthier even losing 15lb less than the previous case.
Take my case. I'm 5'10" and weighted about 187lb about 25% BF (50Lb of fat) in 6 months I was able to reduce to 154Lb (33lb loss) about 10% BF (15Lb of fat), so I burned 35Lb of fat even though my scale would show I lost 33Lb, that because I managed to gain some muscle mass due to doing it very slowly.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







