EricHiggin said:
I'm saying they shout it from the rooftops. There's plenty of people from the other side being quiet indoors who think the same. I'm sure some would like to proclaim it, but it would be overshadowed by a red hat, ironically. So making fun of people with non natural different colored body parts is ok as long as it's not tied to their race or sex or gender? So if someone who's white, wears blackface, but doesn't do it for racial reasons, is that ok? What about orange and the connection to fruit, and referring to someone as a "fruit"? I'm concerned. Are they they implying Trump is gay? Are they saying that's a bad thing? So breaking your own rules is ok as long as you're punching up? When else are the rules bendable if not breakable? How can we be sure those who use this to gain power will follow the rules once they are able to punch down? I'm glad you see things that way, and I agree for the most part. |
I don't think making fun of people for how they look is appropriate, period. I'm simply stating it's not commentary on his race, and culturally that is seen as "not-so-bad".
Comparing black face to calling Trump "orange" is not exactly comparing apples... to oranges... (Buh-dum-tssh) Because of the cultural significance of black face in the US, a white person wearing blackface for any reason is ill-advised, at the very least. It's too easy to misconstrue the intent, even if it was admirable. You have to think about the act and the impact it can have on marginalized people. And in the case of Trump, I don't think people with poor tanning preferences qualify as a marginalized people of significant interest, personally.
Regarding the "fruit" association... As a gay man, that is not an association I would ever naturally draw. In fact, I know many gay men who refer to Trump as an "orange baboon" (take that as you will). Now, if people were calling Trump a "fruit"... Or more relevantly, referring to Buttigieg as a "fruit", I would be pretty peeved.