SammyGiireal said:
Dude you are playing a revisionist role here. In 1998 a steady 24 fps, felt as good as a steady 30fps game feels today. That's how the big world N64 game adventures played, and no one made a big deal of it, because that was a standard. The argument is OoT vs FFVII, the frame rate in both games is what was expected of them in that era, and the positive reception to both, especially Ocarina (given how that game rendered a 3-D world in real-time) showed this. |
Dude, let me refresh your memory, unless you didn’t even read the OP.
The OP asks: Which you you prefer, and why?
It isn’t asking us to question their rightful place in gaming history, or attempt a wanking contest about which is objectively better than the other.
If you aren’t capable of accepting that someone sees flaws in something, or that something that doesn’t bother you may bother someone else, then you should definitely try maturing up a little. Simply because others don’t see exactly the way you do, doesn’t make them wrong.
I managed to articulate some of the things that bothered me with OoT. And somehow, you can’t fathom it because in your little world, everyone and their grandmas are supposed to worship this game.
I would suggest you get over it.