JWeinCom said:
If I don't understand something, then in my mind it's flawed, and I'm free to express my opinion. In turn, you can explain why I'm mistaken and it's not flawed. For example, I think your definition is ridiculously broad, as it would seemingly include games that nobody would consider fighting games, like Double Dragon, Battletoads, Devil May Cry 3, Mario 64, and Donkey Kong 64, while excluding games like Bushido Blade. If you think your definition is not flawed, you are free to explain why not. If you don't care enough to defend your point, you are free not to. If you didn't come to argue, then don't. If you just want to be able to say what you want to say and ignore any criticism then w/e. I swear I'm not going to follow you to your home and force you to respond at gun point. I enjoy stuff like this. If you don't, then find something you'd rather do with your time. Edit: And btw, saying it wasn't fun is not a cheeky response. You specifically brought it up to explain that FF7 has good things. I would say a minigame being a "good" thing would entail being fun. |
I gave one example of what a fighting game is, and even THAT is NOT enough.
No, you don't say it's flawed or ridiculous and then expect an explanation in kindness, you're just inviting baseless arguments and derailments. This is not your personal law school. If I think your questioning is stupid, you can expect retaliatory response, and that is my choice to make. Again this is going no where. This is now I think the 3rd time I said you win. Feel free to have the closing argument.