Mass requires continuous thickness measurements (actual data) which do not exist. You are posting simulated models and the article explains how it is simulated based on proxies and assumptions. All I am using is real measured data without "adjustments", "simulations", "proxies" or "models".
If the hockey stick of polar ice melting is real we should see a spike in ocean levels.
Tide gauge data from around the world. Real data, not models.
Stockholm water levels for the last 130 years. Home of angry G. Does not look like they are drowning...
New York City from 1850 on. A linear, slow increase with no hockey stick whatsoever.
Reykjavik, a small increase until 1990 followed by stagnation.
Cuxhaven, an increase until ca. 1970 followed by stagnation
Tokyo, no change visible for the last 40 years (only a shorter time series available)
All data: https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/
Again, non of the "we are drowning" climate hysteria can be found in real data.
(The small divergence between the continents could be explained by plate tectonics considering we are looking at minuscule changes)
