Conina said:
Just ask yourself why some companies are making multi-platform games. Also, ask yourself why many companies, who aren't making multi-platform games, are not big. We can name a lot of small, medium and big companies making multi-platform games. And we can name a lot of small, medium and big companies making exclusives. So what's your point exactly? |
When someones makes a claim, he is supposed to show why his claim is right, not ask us to prove why his claim is wrong. My only claim is "your claim is wrong", not "the opposite of your claim is true". One day, people will understand that the negation of "making cross-platform games makes you big" isn't "making exclusives make you big".
My point is: his claim is wrong. No, Atlus wouldn't be "big" if they released Persona 5 on XBox One. They could have sold a few hundred thousands copies, but giving it a localization in Europe (I am talking about subs) would have helped A LOT more.
|
You know Atlus's parent company has already gone bankrupt at least once, right? It happened not long after Catherine came out. That's why Sega owns them now. In that case, they probably could have used some guidance in how to handle their business. |
Great fallacy :) If A is doing bad, then following B's advice would have been good XD
For the Wii U, Nintendo should have made porn games. What's the problem, the Wii U sold bad, so they should have followed my advice, right?
