By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sales2099 said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes I forgot MS is all about only releasing sequels instead of I dunno creating new IPs right?

You are here questioning Sony paying how much they paid, do you think Sony couldn't buy other 10 studios of similar price? They sure can, Playstation have been making like 3x the money Xbox do. If MS could buy 5 studios then sony could certainly buy 10.

Hey easy on the propaganda. In the last 4 months MS announced Everwild, Grounded and Project Mara. Bleeding Edge in March. You don’t have to like these games but you should at least acknowledge what they are doing now. 

I think I already talked to you in recent past that yes they are improving.

So you do agree that not having plenty of owned IPs is irrelevant if the studio can make plenty of new games and create IPs?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."