Pemalite said:
The_Yoda said:
I know S/S was not everything people had hoped so I can see where you might deem that settling, but how did Game Freak or Nin lie to people about S/S ? Legit question there, sorry not a fan of the series so although I have bought many iterations of the games for the kids I've never played one myself or followed news of them that closely.
|
I hadn't actually played a Pokemon game since Pokemon Blue in the 90's on the Original Gameboy...
But currently working my way through Pokemon Shield... And honestly, it's a very ugly game.. - Especially as I just finished up Links Awakening before that which was artistically charming.
Clearly the game was built for the 3DS and not the Switch in mind... In saying that, I wasn't aware that it was a remaster? Galar is a new region and there is new, unique Pokemon in the game?
Either way, I am enjoying it for what it is, I don't have the same excitement/addiction over it like I did with Pokemon Blue though when that first came out.
|
About Pokemon S/S, that's exactly how I feel. The game looks like a game developped for the 3DS but, in the middle of the development, they switched to the Switch. They should have delayed the game, but I can at least understand that Game Freak isn't a charity. I won't accept another half-finished game, but Blizzard reached another level with this "reforged":
1) The original is downgraded.
2) The game is bugged.
3) False advertasing.
