By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed said:
HollyGamer said:

Yes it's good for consumer for short terms  but bad for company and will be bad for consumer in the end and bad for the industries  . If you read the whole tweet you will understand. No need a rocket science. I bet you just don't want to accept most developer hate this . As gamer i love free games but there is nothing is free in real life. 

I read the whole tweet. Again, you’re making claims but not making them with any substance. It’s easy to say this will be bad for companies and bad for consumers. It’s harder to actually explain why or how. The most obvious hurdle in your theory is that this is all voluntary. Microsoft doesn’t force anyone to put their games on GwG or GamePass. Sony doesn’t force anyone to do the same with PS+ or PS Now. If this was something really bad for developers, then just don’t do it? 

Also where are the free games? You pay a fee to play the games. The devs get paid by Microsoft or Sony. There’s nothing free here. I’m not going to go back and forth anymore when you aren’t actually explaining anything. Quote me with substance if you want a reply 👍

I have explained everything , i am agree that gamepass is a choice not a must for developer or gamer. That's why it's not a unique to Xbox or a selling point. But some people expect gamepass will be revolutionary and change game industries. But i can see Gampass will just be a normal service pay. It means we can agree on that point.