| HollyGamer said:
|
Again, what? Why would there be no point in GamePass? Playstation or Nintendo also being able to create a similar service doesn't change the fact that GamePass is a great service for customers. And no, it really can't be both. Arguing that it's both is just admitting that you're making an incredibly long reach of logic, which would explain why virtually everything you're saying makes no sense.
| HollyGamer said: Movies also has budget too, but Movie can only be enjoy one time and extremely less on replayability. Games are not equal with Movies. Movies are not interactive and not complicated like making games. |
That's not how movie watching works. Many people watch movies repeatedly. I'd argue for many people movies offer more replay value than games because a movie is a two hour investment give or take, a game can be incredibly longer. I'd love to replay Witcher 3, but damn it would take a long time. I'm going to rewatch the John Wick trilogy soon, its like a six hour investment.
| HollyGamer said: That's the point, the games already devalue them self. Adding game pass as "mainstream" will hasten the process. Like I said that happen if Microsoft trying to make it fully free and kill the normal payment method and traditional method |
How would it hasten the process lol. Just saying something isn't an argument, especially when what you're saying is so detached from reality. You have to explain these theories. And games don't devalue themselves, people with a mindset like you devalue them. You just said the games on GamePass are old, implying they have less value. So putting them on GamePass isn't going to devalue something you already devalued. Furthermore MS and multiple devs have come out and said putting the games on GamePass have increased sales of the games and also DLC.
I somehow doubt you had the same concerns when Sony started giving out "free" games last gen with PS+.
| HollyGamer said: The less people buy hardware and physical , the less product to be produce and create rarity in the market. It will inflate the price |
So you're saying given the chance, more people will buy digital? Awesome. Either way, if your logic here is legit, why aren't movies and music massively overpriced? Also, even in games, prices don't work like this. Calls of Doody will ship millions of copies. Madden will ship millions. Shenmue 3 will ship tens, yet will cost the same price or even less. By your logic it was a rarer product with less produced so it should have an inflated price.
| HollyGamer said: The games suck because game company don't want to spend money on creating big budget title, due to people will just pay one dollar on subscription or worse. Game company are not renting it. They one to sell it |
You're again ignoring the massive quality advantage streaming services have in content over the broadcast networks. I know that it's very damaging to your whole theory, but I'd like to see what zany excuses you come up with for it. You're also yet to actually explain why a company would strive to sell gamers on a service by making the service full of bad games.
| HollyGamer said: It depends where you choose to be. Are you hoping Microsoft to gain advantage from game pass then Microsoft will surely kill triple A games . But if you are hoping it will not change and physical games will have normal price and normal ownership methode then gamepass don't add up anything and it will just a normal service that people can get on Playstation. Because the point of Gamepass is to steal Sony market and invite casual to joint Xbox and there is no point if People still buying physical games. |
GamePass games have physical releases. Your argument has no depth or substance. Just throwing out conspiracy theories and seeing if one sticks, like that user here who predicts the end of MS hardware every time they release a new console or revision.
