By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jason1637 said:
 

1. In a fair investigation or trial lets say someone allegedly assaulted someone but if the person that was allegedly assaulted says that they were not you have no case. 

 

That's quite inaccurate.  You can have cases of sexual assault even if the victim denies it ever happened or insists it was consensual, such as statutory rape.  You can have cases of regular assault (such as a barfight) where the victim can claim that nothing happened but the bartender, owner, server, bouncer or whoever presses charges.  Many times, where an assault takes place is enough to supersede any claims that the assault victim makes.

That's not an opinion.  That's just how the law works.  It's a matter of record, I'm afraid, even in West Korea.  It is to your peril if you test this out for yourself.

But this is not a case of assault, so your insights into the legal system weren't applicable anyway.  This is something else entirely, and the existing evidence is certainly strong enough to stand on its own merits.  If the President of Ukraine wishes to testify, well, West Korea's kangaroo court probably wouldn't allow it.  Beloved Leader's collaborators clearly don't want any more witnesses to go on record.