Barkley said:
How ironic that you're asking me to prove something when you yourself haven't posted a single shred of proof in this thread. "16gb cartridge costs he same as a 25gb bluray disc." Zero evidence. "we had reports of 8gb switch cartridges costing the same as a 25gb bluray at launch in 2017." Zero Evidence. I've already posted a source, you've posted literally nothing and are asking me for proof?
The words are right there, in 2017 8GB = same margin as PS4/XB1 Blu-Ray Disc. In his previous tweet he directly specified he was talking about 50gb discs. Try posting some evidence yourself instead of just making claims with nothing to back them up. |
You are literally proving MY point. It doesn't get any clearer than that. He said an 8gb cartidge costed the same as a ps4/x1 bluray disc and that a 32gb cart costed 60% more than a 50gb bluray. It is a fact that bluray discs have 25gb capacity while dual layered versions have 50gb. That's why we only say bluray disc for the standard versions and have to specify when talking about the dual layered ones. On the other hand, you keep saying that 50gb is the standard size for ps4/x1 discs while showing no proof or evidence for it.
So, you claim I have no evidence but right after shows PROOF that I'm right on the second quoted sentence. And because of that it's safe to assume that BY NOW, the 16gb carts have similar cost compared to the 8gb at launch.
