By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
StreaK said:
Sony is doin it right when it comes to their branding. I applaud them.
I mean, you don't see Lamborghini or Ferrari's, or ANY car company changing their logo with every new car released. You see the logo, you KNOW it's a Lambo or a Ferrari with ease. Same with PlayStation - their logo being the most iconic in all of gaming. It became so because it was always so from the very beginning.

Usually I don't even need to see the logo to guess it is a Lambo or Ferrari (or even masserati or Merces-Benz) and more than likely I'll get it right because their design philosophy have been quite consistent and yes their logo have stayed about the same from a lifetime.

It's actually such a strong logo that we know it even in words "raging bull", "ramping horse" "three pronged star" "the trident", etc.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."