By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BraLoD said:
TruckOSaurus said:

I don't play architectures, I play games. I have very limited interest in the hardware side of consoles but I know that PS3 had some funky processor that made things difficult for developers and that the PS4 did away with that. But for me, the player, PS4 games are better looking, more ambitious PS3 games (because the PS4 is a stronger PS3) and that's a good thing! Sony is the solid rock of the video game industry, I don't expect them to reinvent themselves every generation and I don't want them to, they give me exactly what I expect of them every time: a solid console that keeps up with the times when the previous one is getting old.

Me too, I play games, and I mentioned it as well.

I went on about hardware because you posted about the PS5 being a stronger PS4. But I also covered games not being the case in my post too.

What is a PS3 game from Horizon Zero Dawn? Nier Automata? God of War 4? Dreams?

I'm sorry Trucks, I'm completely cool with you having your own personal view on that, we all do, but when you come saying that about the PS5, which we haven't seen a single new game from yet, it really shows how that it's a preconception.

You seem to be getting the wrong idea from what I'm saying. PS4 can do what PS3 did but Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger. I expect the PS5 to be the same, simple as that. I'm not saying there's no original concepts on PS4, a game like Horizon: Zero Dawn would probably never had made it past the pitch meeting in the PS3 days since the scope of it was too ambitious for the capacity of the PS3 but since the PS4 is Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger it became a great success on PS4.



Signature goes here!