Mr Puggsly said:
You're trying to have it both ways. Those are not spin offs, those three GoW games youre ignoring are GoW games that add to the story and use the same lead character. Kratos can be milked because he's essentially a super hero, a god or whatever. He killed Greek gods, I guess he fights Norse gods now, eventually he will smash up pyramids and punch Jesus. Nathan Drake can't be used the same so Uncharted kinda has to go away unless they want to make more prequels or a game about grandpa Drake. The world on its own is not interesting. |
Market of HH and Console are different. So really for more that there are 9 GoW games, we have 5 console and 4 HH you don't need the HH games to understand the console. So for most people there wasn't saturation from GoW by the time the reboot came.
But yes, for my taste they could have used a different protagonist for GoW and even a new name, but the type of game itself I really like.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."