CGI-Quality said:
HollyGamer said:
Uh, you did read that, right til the end of the article ????
hmmm
|
I've already proven you wrong, but to humor this a bit further, I'll do the work for you...
Performance
·The RTX 2080 Max-Q should be slightly faster than a regular mobile RTX 2070 and therefore a high end gaming graphics card. It should be able to run all demanding games in 4k with maximum details. Raytracing features however may reduce framerates a lot.
·The average RTX 2060 should be on par with a Radeon RX Vega 64 and between the GeForce GTX 1070 and GTX 1080 / 1070 Ti. Therefore, the RTX 2060 is most suited for 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 in demanding games.
You guys can cling to the 'watts' argument all you want, but the real world results show that this idea that the 2080 Max Q "isn't comparable" to a desktop 2060 is blatantly false.
|
Real world performance? we dont see it in any games.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/GeForce-RTX-2080-Max-Q-vs-GeForce-RTX-2060-Desktop-vs-GeForce-RTX-2060-Max-Q_9621_9556_9631.247598.0.html
^ here its very close to a 2060 normal card though, in 3D mark.
This is the one with a 90watt tpd, shown in benchmarks.
*edit again:
Im honestly surprised if its able to get this close to the 2060, in real world usage, at only 90watts.
Because the 2060 can use like 180-190watts while gameing.
Last edited by JRPGfan - on 27 December 2019
