| CGI-Quality said: That’s not what the bold means. It is simply that ‘winning’ doesn’t carry any special (or extra) weight. |
Then why host a vote at all?, Why vote for any president, why would someone not want someone or something to "win". It's very odd to me how this one thread's vote system, is being detached from voting as a concept and the hopes of what voting outcomes can bring, as well as every other voting system, it just doesn't make sense.
Like, down to it's core, you vote for something, in the hopes it will "win" out of all the other votes. There's virtually no other way around that. When people vote for a new president, it's not purely and only "happy thoughts", it's the hopes that their favourite candidate wins and brings about "change".
Like I look at the UK voting as of recent, and I wasn't thinking "gee I'm gonna be happy if anyone but Tories wins the votes", no, I was more like "gee I hope a good candidate wins and fixes all this mess". Not a happy thought, not a "I participated, that's what counts", it was a hope for a win, a candidate I wanted to win...winning the polls.
Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see
So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"
