Chazore said:
The results tell us what is the best looking game of the year. What you and I think, as well as anyone else thinks/says is the subjective part of the discussion about these games. I wish the votes were around the same number as thread replies, because then we'd see some variation within the votes made. Voting carries it's own sort of weight, otherwise there would be virtually no reason at all for the concept of voting for anything, if it held no intrinsic value. @bolded, I'm not sure about that. I don't buy into the special needs "everyone's a winner" mentality. Winners are winners and losers are losers. |
If we were going to do a best on technical level then there would be no point on voting, it should be limited to the experts in VGC making an article over it.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."